[x] Դ˹ҵҧ
Powered by ATOMYMAXSITE 2.5
QA-KVC ENG
Թյ͹Ѻس ؤŷ
Criterion I - Governance and Management

Criterion II : Teaching and Learning

Criterion III : Human Resources

Criterion IV : Research and Development

Criterion V : Image and Sustainability

Criterion VI : Resources

Criterion VII : Support to Students


  

  Ǵ : apacc
ͧ : Criterion I. Indicator A - Administrative Structure and Bodies
: admin
Ҫ : 4115
ظ 27 ͹ áҤ ..2559 ѡش觻ѹ
     

Criterion I - Governance and Management                                                                                                  
Indicator A – Decision Making and Management System
                       
1. How frequent does the institution communicate its vision and mission to stakeholders (administrators, governing board members, school board, students, parents, faculty, staff and community)?
 
Frequency Please tick (/) POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
Every quarter 4  
Every semester 3
Yearly 2
Once in two years 1
Once in three years or never 0
Data Required:  
          Annex 1. Dissemination of Institution’s Vision and Mission to Stakeholders
  
Data Sources:
•         Vision and Mission Statement
•         Institution’s Charter or Constitution
•         Government Laws Affecting Institution
•         Corporate Plan
•         Quality Manual
•         Capability Statement
•         Feedback from the Stakeholders
•         Copies of newsletters and related correspondence

2.    Are the members of the decision-making body involved in the formulation of policy matters pertaining to the institution?
 
Please tick (/) POINTS
Weighted
(2)
Institution’s
Evaluation
Yes        2
No 0







Data Required:
           Annex 2. Composition of the Institution’s Highest Policy-Making Body
 
Data Sources:
·         List of members of the board
·         Records of attendance
 
3.    How often does the institution’s decision making body (Governing Board, Board of Regents, school board, etc.) meet to discuss decision/policy matters of the institution?
 
Frequency Please tick (/) POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
During regular meetings        4
Quarterly 3
Two times a year 2
Once in a year 1
Once in more than a year or never 0











Data Required:
           Annex 3. List of Meetings of the Policy-Making Body
           Annex 4. List of Major Decisions of the Policy-Making Body
           Annex 5. List of Policy and Procedural Manuals (utilized by the institution to operationalize its activities
 
Data Sources (for the past three (3) years):
•         Minutes of the Meetings
•         Attendance Record of the Meetings
•         Memorandum of New Policies Created
•         Summary of Approved Policies
 
4.    How often do you review policies and procedures to conform to the Quality Management System?
 
Frequency Please tick (/) POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
Twice a year        4
Once in a year 3
Once in two years 2
Once in three years 1
Once in more than three years or never 0











Data Sources:
·         Quality Manual, if any
·         Report of Review of QMS
·         Current Organizational Structure
·         Copies of Memorandum Re: Internal Quality Audit (IQA)
·         Schedule of IQA and External Audit
·         Standard Operating Procedures
 
5.    How much is the involvement of the institution’s Administrative Committees in the decision making designed to support the TVET programs? 

 
Please base your answers on the average percentage attendance of the committee members, type of decision (unanimous, by majority, etc.), new initiatives undertaken, benchmarked institutions and the regional/national thrust areas.
 
Percentage of Involvement Please tick (/) POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
91 and above   4  
61 – 90 3
31 – 60 2
1 – 30 1
0 0
 
Data Required:
          Annex 6. Composition of the Administrative Staff
          Annex 7. Involvement of Administrative Committees in Decision Making
 
Data Sources:
•          List of Administrative Committees
•          Summary of meetings conducted by administrative committees
•          Record of Attendance
•          List of Benchmarked Institutions
 
6.    How much is the involvement of the institution’s Academic Committees/Senior Teachers in deciding academic matters like curriculum development/ implementation, grading system, supervision of teaching, etc.?
 

Please base your answers on the average percentage attendance of the committee members, new initiatives undertaken, benchmarked institutions and the regional/national thrust areas. 
 
 
Percentage of Involvement Please tick (/) POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
91 and above 4  
61 – 90 3
31 – 60 2
1 – 30 1
0 0
 
Data Required:
        Annex 8. List of Academic Committees
        Annex 9. Description of Duties of Dean/Department Heads, Faculty and Staff
        Annex 10. Involvement of Academic Committees in Decision Making
 
Data Sources:
  • Summary of meetings conducted by academic committees
  • Approved policy on grading system
  • Current curriculum
  • List of benchmarked institutions





Not Rated stars : Not Rated ҡ 0 .

apacc5 ѹѺش

      Criterion V Indicator B-Consortia/Arrangements with Educational Institutions 21/../2560
      Criterion V Indicator A-Linkage with Industry 21/../2560
      Criterion V Indicator A-Consultancy Program 21/../2560
      Criterion III. Indicator C - Faculty Members Assignments and Load 21/../2560
      Criterion III. Indicator B Qualification of Administrative Staff 21/../2560