[x] Դ˹ҵҧ
Powered by ATOMYMAXSITE 2.5
QA-KVC ENG
Թյ͹Ѻس ؤŷ
Criterion I - Governance and Management

Criterion II : Teaching and Learning

Criterion III : Human Resources

Criterion IV : Research and Development

Criterion V : Image and Sustainability

Criterion VI : Resources

Criterion VII : Support to Students


  

  Ǵ : apacc
ͧ : Criterion III. Indicator C- Systems of Recruitment, Compensation, Evaluation, Development and Motivation
: admin
Ҫ : 3439
ظ 27 ͹ áҤ ..2559 ѡش觻ѹ
     

Indicator C- Systems of Recruitment, Compensation, Evaluation, Development and Motivation
 
1.    How compliant is your institution in observing the system of recruiting faculty members and staff?
 
Percentage of Compliance Please tick
(/)
POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
91 and above  
4       
81 – 90 3
71 – 80 2
61 – 70 1
60 or less 0

Data Sources:
•         Policy on Selection and Recruitment of faculty members and staff
•         List of approving bodies/persons
•         List of faculty members
•         List of staff
 
 
2.    Does your institution follow a set system in compensating the faculty members and staff? If yes, what is the percentage of compliance against the set norms?
 
Percentage of Compliance Please tick
(/)
POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
91 and above     
4  
81 – 90 3
71 – 80 2
61 – 70 1
60 or less 0
Data Required:
Annex 22. Type of Compensation
 
Data Sources: 
•         List of faculty members
•         List of staff
•         Written policy on compensation and rewards
•         Report of faculty members and staff recipients for the past three (3) years
 
3.    How often are the faculty members and staff evaluated with regard to their performance?
 
Frequency Please tick
(/)
POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
Twice a year 4
Once a year or as required 3
Only when promotions are done/ vacant positions are to be filled up 2
Only when complaints are received 1
Never 0
Data Sources:
•         Procedure on Faculty Members and Staff Performance Evaluation
•         Report  of Faculty Members and Staff Performance evaluation for the past three (3) years
 
4.    Does the institution give awards for best performing faculty and staff members?
 
Parameters  Please tick (ü) POINTS
YES
(1)
NO
(0)
Institution’s Evaluation
Institution awards best performing faculty  

 


Institution awards best performing staff
Maximum WEIGHT: 2
Data Sources:
·         Report of Faculty members and staff recipients for the past three years
·         Written policy on rewards
 
 
5.    What is the average percentage involvement of stakeholders (e.g. industry, external subject specialists, community and alumni) in the selection and recruitment process of faculty members and staff?

 
 
Ave. Percentage Involvement
Please tick
(/)
POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
31 and above 4
 
 
 
21 – 30  
3
11 – 20  
2
1 – 10 1
No involvement 0
Data Sources: 
•         Composition of recruitment and selection committee/authority
•         Minutes of meetings
•         Record of attendance
 
  
 6.    What percentage of the faculty members and staff participated in the development program through attendance in seminars, workshops, in-service training, etc. in the last three years? 
 
Percentage of Faculty  Members Participation Please tick
(/)
POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
81 and above 4  

61 – 80 3
41 – 60 2
21 – 40 1
20 or less 0
 
 
Percentage of Staff Participation Please tick
(/)
POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
81 and above 4  

 
 
61 – 80 3
41 – 60 2
21 – 40 1
20 or less 0
Data Sources:
•         Faculty  Development Program
•         Staff Development Program
•         Report on training, workshops, seminars conducted
•         Report of  faculty and staff participation
•         Training Needs Analysis Survey
 
 
7.    How many scholarship grants through training programs or higher degrees were provided to faculty members and staff for the past three years?
 
Scholarship
  • A type of financial aid in the form of a grant that does not have to be repaid by the recipient. Scholarships are most often given to recipients for one of two reasons or both: achievement or financial need. Scholarships are set up for all of the tuition and even things like board, food, books and allowances. However, some scholarships won’t cover all of such benefits but on a partial basis.
 
Professional Development of Faculty and Staff
Number of Scholarships through Training/Higher Degrees were provided Please tick
(/)
POINTS
Weighted
(4)
Institution’s
Evaluation
31 and above 4  
21 – 30
3
10 – 20
2
1 – 9 1
None 0
Data Required:
 
Annex 23. List of Recipients of Different Recognition
 
Data Sources: 
•         Faculty Members and Staff Development Program
•         Summary of scholarship grants through training programs
•         Summary of scholarship grants through higher degrees
•         List of sponsors/donors





Not Rated stars : Not Rated ҡ 0 .

apacc5 ѹѺش

      Criterion V Indicator B-Consortia/Arrangements with Educational Institutions 21/../2560
      Criterion V Indicator A-Linkage with Industry 21/../2560
      Criterion V Indicator A-Consultancy Program 21/../2560
      Criterion III. Indicator C - Faculty Members Assignments and Load 21/../2560
      Criterion III. Indicator B Qualification of Administrative Staff 21/../2560